SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

OM PRAKASH VII
Mala Bansal – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Applicant: Durga Singh
For the Opp.Parties:Govt. Advocate

JUDGMENT

Om Prakash-VII, J.—Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A.

2. This Criminal Misc. Application under Section 482 Cr. P.C. has been filed by the applicant with the prayer to quash the further proceeding of criminal case no. 53 of 2014 pending before Special Judicial Magistrate, Firozabad as well as further proceeding in pursuance of the summoning order dated 29.10.2014 under Section 138 of N.I. Act. Further prayer has been made to stay the further proceedings of the aforesaid case.

3. It appears that respondent no. 2 Manoj Kumar Jain had issued a cheque no. 409405 ACB/SV No. 1409405 on 14.3.2013 in favour of the applicant for an amount of Rs. 20 lacs in connection with the business transaction being done between them. The cheque was issued from the account maintained in the Amanath Co-operative Bank Limited, Bangalore. The said cheque was presented for encashment before the UCO Bank at Firozabad. The aforesaid cheque was returned back unpaid and the applicant’s bank i.e. UCO Bank sent an intimation to him in this regard. In turn the applicant sent a notice to the drawer demanding an amount of Rs. 20 lacs. The amount was never paid by the respondent no. 2 to



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top