SUNEET KUMAR
Virendra Kumar Anand @ V. K. Anand – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
Suneet Kumar, J.—By means of this recall application, the applicant seeks to recall order dated 28.3.2016, whereby the petition was disposed of directing the court below to conclude the trial under Section 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act 1881 (N.I.Act) expeditiously within a stipulated period without granting unnecessary adjournment.
2. The applicant herein sought quashing of proceedings of complaint case No. 3255 of 1999 (Rajendra Swarup Dixit Vs. Aneja Consultancy and another), filed under Section 138 of N.I. Act. The petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C was filed by Sri Manu Saxena, learned counsel for the applicant. The matter was argued at length by the counsel, thereafter, petition was disposed of. The present recall application has been instituted by a subsequently engaged counsel, Sri Anil Tiwari, along with the earlier counsel, who appeared to press the recall application.
3. The assertions made in the recall application are on the merit of the case stating therein that the cheques in question was signed by the applicant as authorized signatory of a proprietor firm M/s Aneja Consultancy, therefore, the applicant would not be liable for prosecution. Upon being summoned
Aneeta Hada Vs. Godfather Travels and Tours (P) Ltd
Hari singh Mann Vs. Harbhajan Singh Bajwa
Asit Kumar Kar Vs. State of West Bengal
State of Punjab Vs. Davinder Pal singh Bhullar
Smt. Sooraj Devi Vs. Pyare Lal and another
Vishnu Agarwal Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and another
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.