SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

OM PRAKASH VII
Vivek Jain – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Applicant: Murari Lal Jain
For the Opposite Party: G.A.

JUDGMENT

Om Prakash-VII, J.—Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned AGA for the State. This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed with a prayer to quash the impugned orders dated 28.7.2015 and 25.3.2015 arising out of criminal complaint case no.757 of 2007 (Vikash Bansal Vs. Vivek Jain) under section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, P.S. Kotwali, District Agra pending in the court of Judicial Magistrate, Court No.1, Agra. Further prayer has been made to stay the proceedings of the aforesaid case.

2. Submission of the learned counsel for the applicant is that no offence, as alleged in the summoning order, is made out against the applicant. Information for stop payment had been given to the Bank and due to that reason, the cheque in question was not encashed. Since there was sufficient fund in the account and applicant has given stop payment instruction, provision of section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act is not attracted in the matter. An objection filed by the applicant in this respect was illegally rejected. It was further submitted that the revision filed against the order of the Magistrate dated 25.3.2015 was also illegally rejected. Learned














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top