OM PRAKASH VII
Vivek Jain – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
Om Prakash-VII, J.—Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned AGA for the State. This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed with a prayer to quash the impugned orders dated 28.7.2015 and 25.3.2015 arising out of criminal complaint case no.757 of 2007 (Vikash Bansal Vs. Vivek Jain) under section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, P.S. Kotwali, District Agra pending in the court of Judicial Magistrate, Court No.1, Agra. Further prayer has been made to stay the proceedings of the aforesaid case.
2. Submission of the learned counsel for the applicant is that no offence, as alleged in the summoning order, is made out against the applicant. Information for stop payment had been given to the Bank and due to that reason, the cheque in question was not encashed. Since there was sufficient fund in the account and applicant has given stop payment instruction, provision of section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act is not attracted in the matter. An objection filed by the applicant in this respect was illegally rejected. It was further submitted that the revision filed against the order of the Magistrate dated 25.3.2015 was also illegally rejected. Learned
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.