SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

VIJAY BISHNOI
Basant Kumar Jain – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Vijay Kumar Vyas, Advocate
For the Respondents: Mr. Vikram Rajpurohit, Public Prosecutor

JUDGMENT

Vijay Bishnoi, J.—These criminal misc. petitions have been filed by the petitioner Basant Kumar Jain against the orders dated 24.5.2014 passed by Additional Sessions Judge No.3, Jodhpur Metropolitan (hereinafter referred to as ‘the revisional court’) whereby the revisional court has dismissed the revision petitions No.7/2014 and No.8/2014 filed by the petitioner. The petitioner has filed the said revision petitions against the orders dated 1.10.2013 passed by the Additional Metropolitan Magistrate N.I. Act No.9, Jodhpur (hereinafter referred to as ‘the trial court’) in Criminal Case Nos.1343/2011 and 627/2011 whereby the applications filed by the petitioner under Section 91 Cr.P.C. were rejected.

2. Brief facts of the case are that during the pendency of proceedings under Section 138 Negotiable Instrument Act, the petitioner filed applications under Section 91 Cr.P.C. and prayed that the complainant-respondent No.2 may be directed to produce the account books of his firm wherein the transactions with the petitioner have been recorded. The prayer of the petitioner was opposed by the respondent No.2-complainant before the trial court while stating that he has already filed con





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top