MANJULA CHELLUR, JOYMALYA BAGCHI
State Bank of India – Appellant
Versus
Vivek Kumar Kejriwal – Respondent
Dr. Manjula Chellur, C.J.—The dispute between the creditor and borrower ultimately led to the present appeal in respect of secured asset secured for the advancement of the loan by the appellant Bank to the respondent No. 5 company. The property consist of ground floor plus three floors and the roof top in Premises at No. 10A, Shakespeare Sarani, Kolkata-700071 which would be referred to as secured asset hereinafter.
2. The writ petition came to be filed by a third party claiming to be a tenant challenging the order passed by Chief Metropolitan Magistrate dated 03.07.2014 in respect of the above secured property contending that he as a tenant being in possession of the property cannot be evicted except under due process of law. The learned Judge in a detailed order allowed the writ petition by setting aside the order of the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Calcutta opining that secured creditor is at liberty to approach the relevant authority in terms of Section 14 of the Security and Reconstruction of Financial assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act 2002 (SARFESI) (hereinafter referred to as the Act) in respect of the secured property.
3. However, so far as validity of
Harshad Govardhan Sondagar Vs. International Assets Reconstruction Company Limited and others
United Bank of India Vs. Satyawati Tandon and Others
Jagadish Singh Vs. Heeralal and others
Indian Overseas Bank and Anr. Vs. Ashok Saw Mill
Kanaiyalal Lalchand Sachdev Vs. State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Standard Chartered Bank Vs. B. Nobel Kumar and Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.