SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

C.V.BHADANG
Helcino Aleixo Fernandes – Appellant
Versus
Milind Madhukar Bhende – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Braganza, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. R.G. Ramani, Advocate

JUDGMENT

C. V. Bhadang, J.—Admit. Mr. Ramani, the learned Counsel waives notice for the respondent. Heard finally by consent. As the applications involve common question of law and fact they are being disposed of by this common judgment.

2. The petitioner herein is the original complainant, who is a businessman residing at Majorda, within the jurisdiction of Judicial Magistrate, First Class at Margao in South Goa District. The respondent happens to be a resident of Mapusa within the jurisdiction of Judicial Magistrate, First Class at Mapusa. The respondent/ accused had obtained a hand loan from the petitioner. Towards repayment of the said loan, the respondent had passed in all 9 cheques in favour of the petitioner. All these cheques were drawn on the account of the respondent with H.D.F.C. Bank Ltd at Panaji within the jurisdiction of Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Panaji, North Goa. All these cheques were payable at par at all the branches of H.D.F.C. Bank Ltd. The petitioner presented the cheques for encashment in his account with Corporation Bank at Uttorda, Majorda. All these cheques were dishonoured on account of insufficient funds. Hence, after issuing the statutory notice






































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top