R.SUBHASH REDDY, A.SHANKAR NARAYANA
Sridhar Enterprises – Appellant
Versus
Bank of Baroda – Respondent
A. Shankar Narayana, J.—Since subject matter of all these writ petitions and the parties are one and the same, they are being disposed of by this common judgment.
2. W.P. No.36652 of 2015 is filed by M/s. Sridhar Enterprises, represented by its proprietor Pathallapally Sridhar seeking Mandamus to declare the auction, dated 10-03-2015, conducted by respondent No.1 - Bank of Baroda, ARM Branch, Himayath Nagar, Hyderabad, and consequential issuance of Certificate of sale of moveable properties, dated 24-09-2015, in favour of respondent No.2 in respect of movable properties of the petitioner as unconstitutional, unjust, illegal and violative of principles of natural justice.
3. W.P. No.36625 of 2015 is also filed by the petitioner in W.P. No.33652 of 2015 seeking Mandamus to declare the auction, dated 13-03-2015, and consequential issuance of sale certificate, document No.7414/15, dated 24-09- 2015, in respect of immovable property admeasuring Acs.15-00, situated in Survey No.100/P, 100/VU, 100/LU, Jiyapally Village, Bibinagar Mandal, Nalgonda District, in favour of respondent No.2, under the provisions of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of
Commissioner of Endowments v. Vittal Rao
Gangavishan Heeralal v. Gopal Digambar jain
General Manager, Sri Siddeshwara Cooperative Bank Limited v. Ikbal
Ramnarayan Triyoginarayan Trivedi v. State of M.P.
Sadashiv Prasad Singh v. Harendar Singh
Trinethra Infra Ventures Ltd. v. IFCI Ltd.
United Bank of India v. Satyawati Tondon
Valji Khimji and Company v. Official Liquidator of Hindustan Nitro Product (Gujarat) Limited
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.