SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

S.K.SAHOO
Bikram Kumar Jena – Appellant
Versus
Deepak Kumar Mohapatra – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. D.P. Dhal, Advocate
For the Opp. Party:Mr. Maheswar Dash, Advocate

JUDGMENT

S.K. Sahoo, J.—This is an application under section 391 of the Cr.P.C. filed by the petitioner Bikram Kumar Jena for passing necessary orders to send the disputed cheque (Ext.2) to the handwriting expert. In the prayer portion, nothing has been indicated as to on what aspect the handwriting expert would examine the cheque in question. However, in paragraph-5 of the misc. case, it is mentioned that the amount mentioned in the cheque, the date mentioned therein and the person to whom it has been issued have been manipulated by the complainant-opposite party and the same is in a complete different ink. Admittedly, no such prayer was made by the petitioner either before the learned Trial Court or before the learned Appellate Court to send the disputed cheque to the handwriting expert.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner Mr. D.P. Dhal contended that to arrive at a just and fair conclusion in the case, the disputed cheque should be sent to the handwriting expert so that the plea of the defence that the cheque has been manipulated could be confirmed.

3. Learned counsel for the opposite party Mr. Maheswar Dash on the other hand filed objection to such application wherein it is me












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top