AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, RAMENDRA JAIN
Allahabad Bank – Appellant
Versus
Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal, Delhi – Respondent
Ramendra Jain, J.—Briefly stated, Respondent nos. 2 and 3 (for short “borrowers”) obtained cash credit limit facility of Rs. 10 lakh from the petitioner-bank in the year 2008 against execution of various documents like demand promissory note, consent letter, acknowledgement letter, agreement of guarantee etc. in favour of the petitioner-bank. Since borrowers could not adhere to the financial discipline, their cash credit facility account was declared Non Performing Asset (“NPA”) on 27.1.2010. Thereafter, on 02.07.2010, the petitioner-bank filed Original Application No.295 of 2010 against respondent nos. 2 to 5 before the Debts Recovery Tribunal-II, Chandigarh (for short “DRT”) for recovery of the outstanding loan amount. Upon notice, when respondent nos. 2 to 5 did not appear, they, vide order dated 16.04.2012 were proceeded ex parte. However, vide order dated 28.5.2013 (Annexure P-2) passed by the DRT-II, Chandigarh, the aforesaid Original Application filed by the petitioner-bank was dismissed in default. Resultantly, the petitioner-bank filed an application dated 18.10.2013 (Annexure P-3) for restoration of its Original Application, which, according to the petitioner-bank
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.