SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Raj Shekhar Attri, J.
Gopi Ram Jain —Petitioner
versus
Attar Singh —Respondent
CRM-M-14159-2017 (O&M), CRM-M-14141-2017, CRM-M-14142-2017, CRM-M-14148-2017, CRM-M-14150-2017, CRM-M-14160-2017, CRM-M-14201-2017, CRM-M-14253-2017, CRM-M-14359-2017, CRM-M-34889-2017, CRM-M-34890-2017, CRM-M-34891-2017, CRM-M-34892-2017, CRM-M-34893-2017, CRM-M-34894-2017, CRM-M-34895-2017, CRM-M-34897-2017, CRM-M-34898-2017, CRM-M-28880-2017, CRM-M-39817-2017, CRM-M-42996-2017
Decided on 24.1.2019

Advocates:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Karanvir Singh Khehar, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. Jai Singh Yadav, Advocate

IMPORTANT POINT
Dishonour of cheque—Offence by company—Whether a director is an active member and participated in the affairs of a Company is a matter of fact.

Headnote:Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 – Sections 138 and 141 – Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 – Section 482 – Dishonour of cheque – Offence by company – Summoning of accused to face trial – Petitioner was active Director of Company and he was absolved of duties much after dishonour of cheques – Whether a director is an active member and participated in the affairs of a Company is a matter of fact – Different kinds of duties and acts have been allocated to directors – Company has to establish by leading cogent evidence that a particular director was given a particular duty – Even if a partner has been absolved of the duties, it must be mentioned in memorandum of articles and other documents of Company – These facts can be proved only by leading evidence during trial – Instead of making payment of sale consideration, Company itself has tried to set up criminal law in motion by writing complaint to Police for registration of FIR against hapless farmers – Company and its directors want to harass them even by using extra-judicial and extra-legal methodology – Nothing has been placed on the record to show that sale deed was executed on mutual understanding of vendors and that of Company or that Company will include this land in its colony and after development of project, consideration will be paid by post-dated cheques as per details mentioned in sale deed – No case is made out to quash impugned complaints and summoning orders – Petitions dismissed with special costs of Rs. 50,000/-. (Paras 30, 31, 36 and 39)

       Result: Petitions dismissed with costs.

JUDGMENT

Raj Shekhar Attri, J.—This order shall dispose of the bunch of aforesaid 22 petitions as common questions of law and facts are involved in all of them. The facts are extracted from CRM-M-14159-2017 for presence of convenience and the parties would be referred by their status in this petition.

2. The present petition (CRM-M-14159-2017) has been filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure for quashing criminal complaint No.156 of 2.11.2016 (NI Act Case No.777 of 2016) (Annexure P-1) filed by the complainant-respondent under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act as well as subsequent proceedings including summoning order dated 2.11.2016 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Rewari whereby the petitioner along with others have been summoned to face trial under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act.

3. This case has chequered history. M/s S.K.G. Buildcon Private Limited is a registered Company (hereinafter referred to as “the Company”). It seems that the Company along with its group Company M/s Ambition Colonisers Private Limited developed a residential colony on a piece of land measuring 13.237 acres situated within the revenue estate of village Maheshwari, District Rewari (Haryana). This land was adjacent to the land measuring 27K-10M owned and possessed by the private respondents/complainants along with other co-sharers who are also impleaded as respondents in connected petitions. The Company has obtained Letter of Intent (in short, ‘LOI’) for the purpose of developing said colony in October, 2012 and obtained licence from the competent authority in March, 2013 to develop this colony on the land measuring 13.237 acres.

4. A bare perusal of Annexure R-2 (which is a plaint of the suit filed by the Company against the land owners) shows that necessary sanction was accorded to the Company by the competent authority and immediately thereafter, the Company started development of Group Housing Residential Complex in the name and style of M/s Kaasa Ramana and earlier this complex was given the name of ARAVALI GREEN VILLAGE. The Company asserts that the house building project got good response and more than 150 flats had already been booked by the intending purchasers before the sale of the land of the private respondents and other co-sharers came into existence. However, the adjacent land measuring 27K-10M was also purchased by the Company vide sale deed dated 10.9.2013 (registered vide No.1311 dated 11.9.2013) from the land owners namely Khazan Singh, Attar Singh, Jai Singh, Smt. Urmila, Smt. Rajbala and Smt. Sunita for a total consideration of Rs.17,18,75,000/-. However, the consideration was paid through cheques and some of them were post-dated cheques which are also duly mentioned in the sale deed dated 10.9.2013. The details of these cheques are duly mentioned in the sale deed which are as under:—

Cheque Number

Date

Amount (Rs.)

Name of Bank

Particulars

005948

10.09.2013

5,00,000

Bank of Maharashtra

Khazan Singh

005949

10.03.2014

25,00,000

Bank of Maharashtra

Khazan Singh

005950

10.09.2016

2,11,87,500

Bank of Maharashtra

Khazan Singh

005966

10.09.2016

5,00,000

Bank of Maharashtra

Khazan Singh

005951

10.09.2013

10,00,000

Bank of Maharashtra

Attar Singh

005952

10.09.2014

50,00,000

Bank of Maharashtra

Attar Singh

005953

10.09.2016

4,30,62,500

Bank of Maharashtra

Attar Singh

005954

10.09.2013

5,00,000

Bank of Maharashtra

Jai Singh

005967

10.09.2014

5,00,000

Bank of Maharashtra

Urmila

005955

10.09.2014

25,00,000

Bank of Maharashtra

Jai Singh

005968

10.09.2016

5,00,000

Bank of Maharashtra

Jai Singh

005956

10.09.2016

2,08,75,000

Bank of Maharashtra

Jai Singh

005957

10.09.2013

5,00,000

Bank of Maharashtra

Urmila

005958

10.09.2014

25,00,000

Bank of Maharashtra

Urmila

005959

10
























































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top