SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1949 Supreme(Pat) 22

MAHABIR PRASAD, M.L.VISA
Abdul Majid – Appellant
Versus
Province Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

Manohar Lall, J.

1. This is an appeal by the plaintiff whose suit for realisation of the salary due to him for the period during which he was in service of the defendant, the Province of Bihar has been dismissed concurrently by the Courts below on the ground that the plaintiffs only remedy was to approach the defendant by a petition for payment of such amount as they may deem fit and proper.

2. The admitted and proved facts are that the plaintiff was appointed a Sub. Inspector of Police by the Inspector-General of Bihar and Orissa in January 1920, and owing to disapproval of his conduct while he was in charge of the Bukhtearpur police station in 1937, departmental proceedings were drawn up against him and he was found guilty of cowardice and for not preparing a searchlist and was punished by being degraded to the lowest grade for 10 years; on appeal, the Deputy Inspector General of Police found the plaintiff guilty of cowardice only and dismissed him from service by the order dated 23rd July 1940 which was communicated to the plaintiff on 29th July. Further appeals by the plaintiff to the Inspector-General of Police and to His Excellency the Governor of Bihar were rejected.





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top