PATNA HIGH COURT
M.L.Visa and Meredith JJ.
Kokil Ram
Versus
Province Of Bihar
Miscellaneous Judicial Case No. 3 of 1947 ;
Decided On : JANUARY 26, 1949
Sales Tax - Betel Leaves - Taxability under Bihar Sales Tax Act, 1944
Fact of the Case:
The assessees, dealers in betel leaves used in making up pan, failed to apply for registration under the Bihar Sales Tax Act, 1944. They contended that betel leaves were exempted from sales tax as they fell under the category of green vegetables.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the notification exempting 'vegetables, green or dried other than medicinal preparations' from sales tax did not include betel leaves. It reasoned that the word 'vegetables' was used in the limited sense of 'herbaceous plants cultivated for food', and as pan is not a food-stuff but a masticatory, it did not fall under the exempted category.
Issues: The main issue was whether betel leaves used in making up pan were taxable under the Bihar Sales Tax Act, 1944, despite the contention that they fell under the category of green vegetables exempted from sales tax.
Ratio Decidendi: The court interpreted the word 'vegetables' in the notification to mean 'herbaceous plants cultivated for food' and concluded that betel leaves, used in making up pan, did not fall under the exempted category. It also considered the nature of pan as a masticatory and not a food-stuff.
Final Decision: The court held that betel leaves used in making up pan were taxable and not exempted under the notification. The assessees were directed to pay the costs of the reference.
Meredith, J.
1. This is a case stated by the Board of Revenue under Sec.21 (3), Bihar Sales Tax Act, 1944. The question referred is :
"Whether green-betel leaves called pan are taxable articles within the meaning of Sec. 6, Bihar Sales Tax. Act, 1944, read with Notfn. No. 7567-F, dated 8-7-1944 issued by the Government of Bihar in the Finance Department."
2. The assessees are 13 dealers in betel leaves used in making up pan. It was found that they had been importing betel leaves from outside the Province of Bihar, and had been carrying on this business for a long time, with an annual gross turnover exceeding Rs. 5000 in the case of each of them during the financial year 1943-44, but they had failed to apply for registration under Section 7 of the Act. Accordingly, the Sales Tax Officer issued notices upon them on 14-3-1945, under Sec.10 (5) of the Act calling upon them to file necessary returns for the quarter ending 31-12-1944. Instead 6f filing returns, the assessees filed objection petition on the ground that betel leaves come within the category of green vegetables and as-such were exempted from the levy of sales tax by Notfn. No. 7567 dated 8-7-1944, issued by the Government under Section 6 of the Act. Subsequently they filed before the Commissioner of Sales Tax, Chota Nagpur Division, a joint petition for determination of the question whether any tax was payable in respect of the sale of betel leaves. The Commissioner took the view that the notification in question was not intended to exclude betel leaves from taxation, and that the word "vegetables" in the notification was used in the ordinary popular sense of "a plant cultivated for food". He accordingly dismissed the petition. The assessees then moved the Board of Revenue in revision, but the Board took the same view. The assessees then filed an application under Sec.21 (1) of the Act which has resulted in the present reference.
3. The notification referred to direct that no tax shall be payable on the sale of a number of classes of goods specified. Item 6 is "vegetables, green or dried other than medicinal preparations". Hence the question for decision is whether the word "vegetables" must be taken to include betel leaves. The word "vegetable" is used in two different senses : first, in a wide sense, as for example, when we speak of "the vegetable kingdom". According to this usage, it would include all plants. The second sense, and the more common usage, is as connoting only "herbaceous plants cultivated for food" (see Websters Dictionary). It is perfectly clear from the notification that Government used the word in the more limited sense in accordance with the common usage. The notification includes 25 items, many of which are not food-stuffs, but all the items up to 8 are food-stuffs, and item 6, which we are considering, thus comes in the midst of the list of food-stuffs. Secondly, it is impossible to suppose that Government meant to exclude the entire vegetable kingdom. Lastly,--and this is most convincing--item 1 is
"cereals and pulses including all forms of rice, gram, peas, moong, arhar, masur, khesari, millet, bajra, and jowar, wheat, oats, barley, maize, powdered or broken pulses, sago, besan and sattu, sold loose or in unsealed cardboard or paper containers."
Item 3 is "flour including atta, maida, suji and bran". Item 8 is "gur, sugar and molasses". If the word "vegetables" had been used in a comprehensive sense to include all plants and their products, then items 1 and 8 would not have been separately specified. There can, therefore, in my opinion, be no doubt that Government by "vegetables" meant plants cultivated for food.
4 In this limited sense, will pan be included ? Pan is certainly not a food-stuff. It is a masticatory (see the article on "betel" in the Encyclopaedia Britannica). Some hold that it is also a digestive. But, even so, it is not a food. It is not eaten for its food value, but at the highest as an aid to digestion. It is not ser
AI
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.