SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1949 Supreme(Pat) 62

MEREDITH, V.RAMASWAMI
Jagat Kishore Pd. Narain Singh – Appellant
Versus
Parmeshwar Singh – Respondent


Judgment

Meredith, J.

1. This is a defendants second appeal in a suit for recovery of Rs. 300 and interest, by way of damages, in respect of realisation by the defendant of the decretal dues twice over in two rent suits. These rent suits were decreed in 1935. According to the plaintiffs case and the findings of the Courts below, the sum of Rs. 300 was paid out of Court in the year 1936 under a promise of certification, but in fact the payment was never certified, and execution for the full amount of the decrees was taken out in the year 1937. On 5.4.1937, the plaintiff made an application under Order 21, Rule 2, Civil P. C., for certification of the payment, but this-application was dismissed as barred by limitation under Article 174, Limitation Act, and also as it was held that payment had not been proved. There was an appeal, but the appeal also was dismissed. Subsequently in the execution proceedings the judgment-debtor had to pay over again, paying by instalments from 16-1-1940, onwards. The plaintiff waited for full three years before doing anything about it, and on 19.1-1943, filed the present suit. There were, however, a few days holidays prior to the 19th of January, and it































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top