V.RAMASWAMI, SARJOO PRASAD
Rajballam Singh – Appellant
Versus
Madhusudan Prasad Singh – Respondent
Ramaswami, J.
1. It appears that the petitioner had filed an appeal in the lower Court together with a petition for dispensing with copy of judgment because an appeal had been filed in an analogous case disposed of by the same judgment, a copy of which had been attached to the memorandum of appeal in that case. The applicant was nevertheless directed to file a copy of the judgment within five days and upon his default the memorandum of appeal was rejected. He then filed an application under Order 41, Rule 19, Civil P. C. and Sec.161, for restoration of the appeal. The lower Court rejected the application on the ground that Sec.151 was not applicable. Against this order the applicant has obtained the present rule.
2. The question to be determined in this case is whether the order rejecting the memorandum of appeal for failure to furnish copy of judgment constitutes a "decree" within the meaning of Sec.2, Clause (2), Civil P. C.
3. Sec.2 (2) defines a decree as
"the formal expression of an adjudication which, so far as regards the Court expressing it, conclusively determines the rights of the parties with regard to all or any of the matters in controversy in the suit and may
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.