SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1950 Supreme(Pat) 71

V.RAMASWAMI, SARJOO PRASAD
Rajballam Singh – Appellant
Versus
Madhusudan Prasad Singh – Respondent


Judgment

Ramaswami, J.

1. It appears that the petitioner had filed an appeal in the lower Court together with a petition for dispensing with copy of judgment because an appeal had been filed in an analogous case disposed of by the same judgment, a copy of which had been attached to the memorandum of appeal in that case. The applicant was nevertheless directed to file a copy of the judgment within five days and upon his default the memorandum of appeal was rejected. He then filed an application under Order 41, Rule 19, Civil P. C. and Sec.161, for restoration of the appeal. The lower Court rejected the application on the ground that Sec.151 was not applicable. Against this order the applicant has obtained the present rule.

2. The question to be determined in this case is whether the order rejecting the memorandum of appeal for failure to furnish copy of judgment constitutes a "decree" within the meaning of Sec.2, Clause (2), Civil P. C.

3. Sec.2 (2) defines a decree as

"the formal expression of an adjudication which, so far as regards the Court expressing it, conclusively determines the rights of the parties with regard to all or any of the matters in controversy in the suit and may





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top