MEREDITH, V.RAMASWAMI
Abdul Kabir – Appellant
Versus
Mt. Jamila Khatoon – Respondent
Ramaswami, J.
1. In the suit, which is the subject of this appeal, the plaintiffs claimed that on 16-2-1938, they had purchased holding No. 221 of Giridin town, area about 3 bigahs 8 kathas, by registered kobala from defendants 4 and 5, Md. Ishaw and Abdul Jabbar. The relationship of the parties will appear from the following pedigree.
MOHAN MIAN
|
---------------------------------------
Bulaki Bibban (D. 3)
(by 1st wife) |
|
Guldasta (D. 2)
----------------------------------------------------
| | | |
Ishaq Jabbar Mt. Jamila Mt. Hasiba
D. 4. D. 5. D. 1. D. 6.
The plaintiffs alleged that defendants 4 and 5 had previously sold 3 kathas of holding NO. 224 to Mohammad Qasim who in his turn sold to Guldasta and Mt. Bibban (defendants 2 and 3). After having made the purchase, defendants 2 and 3 encroached upon holding No.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.