SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1950 Supreme(Pat) 2

MEREDITH, V.RAMASWAMI
Abdul Kabir – Appellant
Versus
Mt. Jamila Khatoon – Respondent


Judgment

Ramaswami, J.

1. In the suit, which is the subject of this appeal, the plaintiffs claimed that on 16-2-1938, they had purchased holding No. 221 of Giridin town, area about 3 bigahs 8 kathas, by registered kobala from defendants 4 and 5, Md. Ishaw and Abdul Jabbar. The relationship of the parties will appear from the following pedigree.

MOHAN MIAN

|

---------------------------------------

Bulaki Bibban (D. 3)

(by 1st wife) |

|

Guldasta (D. 2)

----------------------------------------------------

| | | |

Ishaq Jabbar Mt. Jamila Mt. Hasiba

D. 4. D. 5. D. 1. D. 6.

The plaintiffs alleged that defendants 4 and 5 had previously sold 3 kathas of holding NO. 224 to Mohammad Qasim who in his turn sold to Guldasta and Mt. Bibban (defendants 2 and 3). After having made the purchase, defendants 2 and 3 encroached upon holding No.






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top