SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1950 Supreme(Pat) 31

SINHA, NARAYAN
Raghuraj Prasad Singh – Appellant
Versus
Basudeo Singh – Respondent


Judgment

Narayan, J.

1. These are plaintiffs second appeals in suits for rent. The plaintiff had originally claimed the value of produce rent for the years 1350 and 1351 but as during the pendency of the suits the produce rent was commuted into cash rent, the plaintiff sought an amendment of the plaint and claimed cash rent; for the years 1348 to 1351. The prayer was allowed and the jama of Rs. 9-3.6 per acre as fixed by the Bent Commutation Officer on 20th September 939 was inserted in the plaint by an order of the learned Munsif dated 19th April 1945. An appeal having been preferred against the order of the Rent Commutation Officer fixing at RS. 9-3-6 per acre, the order of the Rent Commutation Officer was confirmed by the Collector on 4th January 1941. Against the order of the Collector the tenants as well as the landlord filed revision applications before the Commissioner, and the Commissioner remanded the oases with the direction that fresh rates should be fixed after a local inspection. After remand, the Rent Commutation Officer by an order dated 6th January 1944 reduced the rates as originally fixed, and a revised schedule was accordingly prepared. The claim having been made



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top