SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1950 Supreme(Pat) 34

IMAM, NARAYAN
Kaulesari Singh – Appellant
Versus
Ambika Dutt Singh – Respondent


Judgment

Narayan, J.

1. This is a plaintiffs appeal arising out of a suit for partition. One Bisun Singh had three sons, Kishun Singh, Narain Singh and Bharath Singh. Plaintiff 1 is the son of Kishun Singh, and plaintiffs 2 and 3 are the sons of plaintiff 1. Defendant 12 is the only surviving representative of the branch of Bharath Singh, he being Bharatha grandson. Defendant 4 is the widow of Narain Singh and defendants 1, 2 and 3 are the sons of Narain Singh. The other defendants are the grandsons of Narain Singh. The plaintiffs case is that the family is still joint, that Narain was the karta of the family till his death which took place in the year 1938, and that after his death, defendant 1 has been the karta. It is further alleged that Narain was in Government service and acquired properties in the name of his wife bat with funds belonging to the joint family and that as such the properties standing in the name of defendant 4 are liable to be partitioned.

2. The defendants main contentions are that there was a partition of the joint family properties in the year 1337, which corresponds to the English calendar year 1929, and that the properties standing in the name of defendant






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top