SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1950 Supreme(Pat) 59

NARAYAN, V.RAMASWAMI
Hakim Md. Idris – Appellant
Versus
Md. Kabir – Respondent


Judgment

Ramaswami, J.

1. This case has a long and complicated history; but the question posed for decision in this appeal liea within a short compass. The appellant brought the suit for a declaration of title, for possession and mesne profits with respect to 1/9th share of certain villages which belonged to her parents Fazl Imam and Bibi Zohra, The respondent who was her eldest brother admitted her claim. The other defendants effected a compromise with the appellant which was recorded by the Court. On 9th February 1926 the appellant obtained a decree for possession of her share and for mesne profits. It is not necessary to trace in detail the further stages of the litigitions. On 28th March 1934, the plaintiff filed an application for ascertainment of mesne profits from the respondent with respect to her share according to the preliminary decree. Mr. Bagchi who was the Subordinate Judge at the time issued notice to the parties, recorded evidence of witnesses and on 8th March 1939 adjudicated the quantum of mesne profits. The last paragraph of his order states :

"I would therefore allow mesne profits for the period of claim at Rs. 652 per year according to the previous finding (vide

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top