SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1950 Supreme(Pat) 83

V.RAMASWAMI, SARJOO PRASAD
Ganesh Ram – Appellant
Versus
Baikunthesh Prasad Singh – Respondent


Judgment

Ramaswami, J.

1. This appeal is presented against the order of the District Judge of Shahabad refusing to restore an appeal which had been dismissed for default.

2. The plaintiffs had brought a suit for redemption of a rehan bond alleging that they had deposited the amount in Count under Section 83, T. P. Act and had also caused a notice thereof Served upon the defendant. In spite of the service of notice the defendant refused to give possession of the land and the plaintiffs therefore claimed mesne profits for the period subsequent to the date of the deposit of the rehan money. The defendant contested the suit on the ground that the plaintiffs bad no right to redeem. The trial Court granted a decree for redemption but rejected the claim for mesne profits on ground that there was no evidence adduced to prove that plaintiffs had made the deposit on the alleged date. Against this decree the defendant filed an appeal. The plaintiffs filed a cross objection with respect to the claim for mesne profits which had been disallowed by the trial Court.

3. The learned Judge fixed 16-9-1947 for hearing the appeal, On that date counsel for the appellant stated that his client reached Arr













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top