SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1950 Supreme(Pat) 121

SINHA, S.K.DAS
Inderdeo Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

Das, J.

1. The five petitioners have been convicted of contravening an order passed under Sec. 6, Bihar Maintenance of Public Order (NO. 2) Ordinance, 1919, and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for one year each. Sec. 6 of the said Ordinance, so far as it is relevant for our purpose, reads thus:

"The Provincial Government may, for the purpose of securing the public safety OR the maintenance of public order, by general or special order, prohibit, restrict or impose conditions upon, the holding of or taking part in public processions, meetings or assemblies."

On 25-6-1949, the Provincial Government pass-ed the following order purporting to act under the provisions of Sec. 6:

"In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section (1) of Sec. 6, Bihar Maintenance of Public Order (No. 2) Ordinance, 1949, and for the purpose of securing the public safety and the maintenance of public order, the Governor of Bihar is pleased to direct that no public meeting or procession shall be held without the permission of the District Magistrate or the Additional District. Magistrate of the district; Provided that this order shall not apply to marriage and funeral processions or to condolence m





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top