Reuben, J.

1. On the petition of the Light Railway Company filed on 28-6-1950, a rule has been issued on the opposite party to show cause why a writ of mandamus should not issue against them restraining them from interfering with the possession of the Company over the pro-patties and management of the Bihar Bukhtiarpur Light Railway. There is also a rule against the District Board of Patna (opposite party 3), Mr. Khaderan Singh, Chairman of the District Board (opposite party 4), and Mr. H. Subberwal, ex-Head Accounts Officer of the Light Railway Company (opposite party 5) to show cause why they should not be committed for contempt of Court. At the same time, an ad interim injunction was issued restraining the opposite party from interfering with the possession of the Light Railway Company. It being asserted on behalf of the District Board that dispossession had already taken place before the issue of the injunction, a further rule has been issued on the District Board of Patna and Mr. Khaderan Singh, on a petition filed by the Light Railway Company on 19-7-1950, to show cause why a mandatory injunction shall not issue against them directing them to restore possession of the