SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1950 Supreme(Pat) 87

LAKSHMIKANTA JHA, REUBEN
Raghubans Prasad Singh – Appellant
Versus
Lakhan Gope – Respondent


Judgment

1. This is an appln. by three persons who have been ordered to execute bonds for Rs. 1000 each with two sureties in the like amount for keeping the peace.

2. The Mag. on the basis of a petn. filed on 1-2-1949, by one Lakhan Gope & a police report thereon, started a proceeding under Sec.107, Cr. P. C., & ultimately passed the order referred to above. The order was upheld in appeal by the 3rd. Addl. Ses. J., Patna. The matter then came to this Ct. in revision, and the Chief Justice by his order dated 4-4-1950, rejected the appln. summarily.

3. We are asked to grant a certificate under Article 134 (1) (c), Const. Ind., which provides that an appeal shall lie to the S. C. from any final order in a criminal proceeding of H. C. in the territory of India if the H. C. certifies that the case is a fit one for appeal to the S. C. There is a proviso to Article 134 (1) which lays down that an appeal under Sub-clause (c) shall be subject to such provision as may be made in that behalf under Clause (1) of Article 145 & to such conditions as the H. C. may establish or require ; we are not concerned in the present case with any such provision or condition.

4. The only ground on which we ca










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top