SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1951 Supreme(Pat) 40

SARJOO PRASAD, V.RAMASWAMI
Md. Amin Brothers – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

Ramaswami, J.

1. These cases are stated by the Board of Revenue under Sec.21 (3), Bihar Sales Tax Act.

2. The following question of law has team referred in both the statements:

"Whether in order dated 30-4-48 dismissing the appeal for default without deciding the question raised by the appellant in his memo, of appeal to the Commissioner is intra vires & in accordance with law."

3. On behalf of the assessee, Mr. S. N. Dutt sited Sec.20 of the Act which provides that within sixty days from the passing of an order of assessment, with or without penalty, under Sec.10, any dealer may, in the prescribed manner, appeal to the prescribed authority against such assessment or penalty for both. Under Sec.20(2) the appellate authority, in disposing of any appeal under Sub-section (1), may confirm, reduce, enhance or annul the assessment or penalty, if any, or both, "subject to such rules as have been prescribed." Reference was made to Rules 57, Bihar Sales Tax Rules, which is to the-following effect:

"Summary rejection of appeal.--If the memo, of appeal is not in Form XXIV or if all the requirements of the form are not duly complied with, the appeal may be summarily rejected after gi





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top