SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1951 Supreme(Pat) 77

JHA, AHMAD
Raghunandan Rai – Appellant
Versus
Sukhlal Rai – Respondent


Judgment

1. This appeal is directed against an appellate order of Mr. Naqui Imam, District Judge, Muzaffarpur, dated the 20th May, 1949, remanding the case to the Court of first instance for disposal after taking evidence in the case.

2. The plaintiff filed a suit on the 5th of December, 1947, for certain reliefs, and on the 7th of January, 1949, he filed a petition that the dispute had been settled out of Court by arbitrators with the consent of both parties and prayed that a decree be passed in terms of the award under Order 23, Rule 3, Code of Civil Procedure. The defendants denied the allegation of the plaintiff and contended that the award is illegal and fraudulent and that the Court had no jurisdiction to order the suit to be disposed of in terms of the award without their consent. The trial Court, without taking any evidence on the merits of the allegations of the parties, held that, as there was objection by the defendants to the recording of the compromise, it could not be given effect to in law.

There was an appeal by the plaintiff, and the learned District Judge, without expressing any view as to the legality of the order and as to whether the Court had at all any jurisdi













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top