SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1951 Supreme(Pat) 43

SARJOO PRASAD, V.RAMASWAMI
In Re – Appellant
Versus
. – Respondent


Judgment

Ramaswami, J.

1. This reference is made by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal under Sec. 66 (1), Income-tax Act.

2. The assessee Chaturam Horilram Limited of Kodarma is a private limited company which is composed of two Hindu undivided families of which Chaturam & Darshanram are the kartas. The assessee carried on the business of exporting mica for sale to foreign countries. On 22-12-1939 the Income-tax officer made assessment for the year 1939-40 & determined the total income to be Rs. 1,09,200. In appeal the Appellate Tribunal set aside the assessment on the ground that the Indian Finance Act of 1939 was not in force in Chotanagpur which was a partially excluded area. At the instance of the Commissioner of the Income-Tax reference was made to the High Court on the following question:

"whether levy of income-tax should be made on the assessee for the year 1939-40 in the absence of a notification under Section 92 (1), Govt. of India Act, by the Governor extending the Finance Act of 1939 to the excluded area?"

On 30-9-1943, the High Court answered the question in the negative.

3 After the decision of the Appellate Tribunal but before the date of the judgment of the High Court

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top