SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1951 Supreme(Pat) 120

LAKSHMIKANTA JHA, CHATTERJI
Siaram Singh – Appellant
Versus
Jugutdeo Singh – Respondent


Judgment

Chatterji, J.

1. This is an appeal by the plaintiffs in a suit to enforce a simple mortgage dated the 4th May, 1931.

2. The mortgage in question was executed by the predecessor of defendants 1 and 2 (defendants first party) in favour of Bechan, deceased father of defendants 8 and 9 (defendants fourth party), for Rs. 175/- repayable by the 15th of Baisakh, 1339 Fasli (April-May 1932) with interest at 2 per cent, per mensem. The plaintiffs are the transferees of the entire, mortgaged interest from Be-chans sons defendants 8 and 9 under a bechinama dated the 26th October, 1943. It is, however, now conceded that the mortgage, though executed in favour of Bechan alone, was taken by him on behalf of the joint family consisting of himself and his brother Birju. Defendants 3 to 8 (defendants second party) and defendant No. 7 (defendants third party) are subsequent transferees of portions of the mortgaged property. The suit was instituted on the 4th February, 1944, claiming Rs. 350/-, that is, Rs. 175 as principal and Rs. 175/- as interest; the remaining interest due was given up in view of the provisions of the Bihar Money Lenders Act.

3. The suit was contested by defendant No. 3 a

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top