SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1951 Supreme(Pat) 155

PATNA HIGH COURT
Lakshmikanta Jha and Reuben JJ.
Sukar Gope
Versus
State Of Bihar
Miscellaneous Judicial Case No. 359 of 1951 ;
Decided On : DECEMBER 19, 1951

Rejection or acceptance of a nomination paper is "election" within the meaning of Article 329 (b) of the Constitution.

Headnote:

ELECTION - Rejection of nomination paper - Whether rejection of nomination paper is "election" within the meaning of Article 329 (b) of the Constitution - Whether High Court has power to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ for the rectification of the order of the Returning Officer under Article 226 of the Constitution - Whether the petitioner has a remedy by an election petition.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner, a registered voter for the State Assembly of Bihar, filed a nomination paper for being elected to fill a seat in the said constituency. On the date fixed for scrutiny, his nomination paper was rejected by the Returning Officer on the ground that it did not comply with the provisions of Sec.33 (5), Representation of the People Act, 1951. The petitioner approached the High Court seeking a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ under Article 226 of the Constitution, calling upon the Returning Officer to show cause why his order rejecting the nomination paper should not be quashed and the name of the petitioner included in the list of valid nominations.

Finding of the Court:

1. The rejection or acceptance of a nomination paper is "election" within the meaning of Article 329 (b) of the Constitution. 2. The High Court has no power to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ for the rectification of the order of the Returning Officer under Article 226 of the Constitution. 3. The petitioner has a remedy by an election petition.

Issues: 1. Whether rejection of nomination paper is "election" within the meaning of Article 329 (b) of the Constitution? 2. Whether High Court has power to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ for the rectification of the order of the Returning Officer under Article 226 of the Constitution? 3. Whether the petitioner has a remedy by an election petition?

Ratio Decidendi: 1. The word "election" in Article 329 (b) of the Constitution must be understood to mean all the different stages of election, commencing after the appointment of dates for making nominations as provided under Sec.30 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951. 2. Article 329 (b) of the Constitution is mandatory and lays down that no election shall be called in question except by an election petition presented to such authority and in such manner as may be provided for by or under any law made by the appropriate legislature. 3. The petitioner has a remedy by an election petition which he may file, if he so chooses, in accordance with the rules prescribed in that behalf.

Final Decision: The application for a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ is dismissed.

Judgment

Jha, J.

1. The petitioner is a registered voter for the State Assembly of Bihar and his name has been duly entered in the voters list in the constituency of Lachmipur-cum-Jamur in the district of Monghyr. He filed a nomination paper on 23-11-1951, for being elected to fill a seat in the said constituency. On 26-11-1951, the date fixed for scrutiny, his nomination paper was, on objection of another candidate for the same seat, rejected by the Returning Officer on the ground that it did not comply with the provisions of Sec.33 (5). Representation of the People Act, 1951 (Act LIII of 1951). The petitioner has, therefore, come up to this Court and asks for a writ in the nature of mandamus. or any other appropriate writ, under Article 226 of the Constitution, calling upon the Returning Officer to show cause why his order rejecting the nomination capers should not be quashed and the name of the petitioner included in the list of valid nominations and the list so rectified published in accordance with law.

2. We shall assume for the decision of the point raised before us that the Returning Officer has improperly rejected the nomination paper of the petitioner. The question for decision is whether, in view of the provisions of Article 329 (b) of the Constitution, it is within our power, authority or jurisdiction to issue a writ in the nature of mandamus, or any other appropriate writ, for the rectification of the order of the Returning Officer under Article 226 of the Constitution and give an adequate remedy to the petitioner.

3. The Constitution in Part XV (Articles 324 to -329) under the head "Elections" lays down the law to be followed with respect to all matters relating" to or in connection with elections to either House of Parliament or to the House or either House of the Legislature of a State. Election to the House of the People or to the Legislative Assembly of a State is to be held on the basis of adult suffrage. Every citizen of India is entitled to vote for a seat in the House of the People and the Legislative Assembly of a State if he is not less than twenty-one years of age on such date as may be fixed in that behalf irrespective of his race, caste or sex or any of them and if he is not otherwise disqualified to be a voter. But this adult suffrage, which does not depend upon property qualification, could not be claimed as a matter of right by any citizen of India in the absence of the express provision in that behalf of the Constitution.

4. In order to appreciate the argument at the bar it is necessary to quote Articles 324 (1), 326, 327 and 329 (b) of the Constitution, which are as follows :

"324 (1). The superintendence, direction and control of the preparation of the electoral rolls for, and the conduct of all elections to Parliament and to the Legislature of every State and of elections to the offices of President and Vice-President held under this Constitution, including the appointment of election tribunals for the decision of doubts and disputes arising out of or in connection with elections to Parliament and to the Legislatures of States shall be vested in a Commission (referred to in this Constitution as the Election Commission)."

"326. The elections to the House of the People and to the Legislative Assembly of every State shall be on the basis of adult suffrage; that is to say, every person who is a citizen of India and who is not less than twenty-one years of age on such date as may be fixed in that behalf by or under any law made by the appropriate Legislature and is not otherwise disqualified under this Constitution or any law made by the appropriate Legislature on the ground of non-residence, unsoundness of mind, crime or corrupt or illegal practice, shall be entitled to be registered as a voter at any such election."

"327. Subject to the provisions of this Constitution, Parliament may from time to time by law make provision with respect to all matters relating to, or in connection with, elections t


























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top