SARJOO PRASAD, V.RAMASWAMI
Firm Jitanram Nirmalram – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner Of Income Tax – Respondent
Ramaswami, J.
1. This reference is made by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal under Section 66(2) of the Indian Income-tax Act.
2. The applicant was assessed under the Excess Profits Tax Act in respect of the chargeable accounting periods corresponding to 1941-12 and 1942-1943. He subsequently filed an application before the Commissioner of Income-tax under Sec.20 of the Excess Profits Tax Act for re-calculation of the amounts. The Commissioner asked for a report from the Income-tax Officer who made recomputation and communicated the result to the applicant on 18th July 1944.
The applicant made certain suggestions on 24th July 1944. Three days after the Income-tax Officer issued notice under Sec.34 of the Income-tax Act which is to the following effect: "Whereas in consequence of definite information which has come into my possession I have discovered that your income assessable to income-tax for the year ending 31st March 1943 has (a) escaped assessment, I therefore propose to assess the said income that has escaped assessment. I hereby require you to deliver to me not later than 28-8-44 or within 30 days of the receipt of this notice, a return in the attached form of your
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.