SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1951 Supreme(Pat) 27

SARJOO PRASAD, V.RAMASWAMI
Firm Jitanram Nirmalram – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner Of Income Tax – Respondent


Judgment

Ramaswami, J.

1. This reference is made by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal under Section 66(2) of the Indian Income-tax Act.

2. The applicant was assessed under the Excess Profits Tax Act in respect of the chargeable accounting periods corresponding to 1941-12 and 1942-1943. He subsequently filed an application before the Commissioner of Income-tax under Sec.20 of the Excess Profits Tax Act for re-calculation of the amounts. The Commissioner asked for a report from the Income-tax Officer who made recomputation and communicated the result to the applicant on 18th July 1944.

The applicant made certain suggestions on 24th July 1944. Three days after the Income-tax Officer issued notice under Sec.34 of the Income-tax Act which is to the following effect: "Whereas in consequence of definite information which has come into my possession I have discovered that your income assessable to income-tax for the year ending 31st March 1943 has (a) escaped assessment, I therefore propose to assess the said income that has escaped assessment. I hereby require you to deliver to me not later than 28-8-44 or within 30 days of the receipt of this notice, a return in the attached form of your

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top