SINHA
Delho Hansda – Appellant
Versus
Charani Hansda – Respondent
Sinha, J.
1. The appeal and the application have been filed by the plaintiff.
2. The plaintiff filed the suit for a declaration that She being the daughter of one Meraha Hansdan is the only heir of her deceased lather and also prayed for recovery of possession of the lands mentioned in the plaint. A prayer lor mesne profits was also made. Her case is that her father, who will hereafter be mentioned as Moraha, had three wives only, and he had seven daughters by the three wives. The other daughters have been made defendants 2nd party. Moraha had no son, and, in view of the Santhal laws and custom, he got the plaintiff married to one Mandal Murmu in ghar jamai form, and since the marriage, which happened twenty years before the date of the suit, Manual Murmu had been living there as gharjamai. Moraha died in 1350 B. S., and after his death, plaintiffs husband had been appointed the Prodhan of the village, a post which was held until death by Moraha. The plaintiff also alleged that defendant 1 Charani Hansda had been illegally interfering with her possession which led to a criminal case and it ended in conviction of Charani Hansda under Sec. 447, Penal Code, in the trial Court,
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.