SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1952 Supreme(Pat) 57

AHMAD, LAKSHMIKANTA JHA
Pramada Prasad Mukharjee – Appellant
Versus
Sagarmal Agarwala – Respondent


Judgment

1. The question for decision in this appeal is whether an action commenced by the plaintiffs should, on the application of the defendant, who is the appellant before us, be stayed, pursuant to Sec.34 of the Indian Arbitration Act, 1940 (Act X of 1940), in order that the matters in dispute between the parties may be dealt with by the arbitrators under the arbitration agreement. The trial Court has declined to stay the suit. The defendant has, therefore, come up to this Court in appeal.

2. The defendant has a lease-hold interest in a colliery in village Patlaoari in the Jharia Coalfield in the district of Manbhum, fully specified in Schedule A to the plaint. On the 28th of June 1948, there was an agreement between the plaintiff No. 1 (hereinafter referred to as the plaintiff: other plaintiffs being junior members of his family) and the defendant, under which the latter granted what is described as a managing agency of the colliery for a term of seven years to the plaintiff on certain terms and conditions fully set out in the agreement and made over possession of the colliery together with the machinery, building and structures appertaining thereto, to the plaintiff, and the p















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top