RAI, IMAM, CHOUDHARY
Dhup Narain Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent
Imam, J.
1. This Bench was constituted to consider the nature of appeals filed under Section 476B, Criminal P. C. where a complaint has been, filed by a Civil Court under Sec. 476, Criminal P. C; in (other?) words, whether such appeals are in the nature of civil appeal or criminal appeals.
2. The District Judge of Shahabad filed a complaint under Sec. 476, Criminal P. C. against Dhup-Narain Singh under Sections 197, 199 & 471, Penal Code, (for offences?) alleged to have been committed by Dhup Narain Singh in the course of Probate Case No. 17 of 1950 (Title Suit No. 4 of 1952) in the Court of the District Judge. An appeal under Sec. 476B* Criminal P. C. has been filed by him in this Court.
3. The Court of the District Judge is undoubtedly a Civil Court and not a Criminal Court, although the District Judge in this State also exercises the powers of a Sessions Judge. When the District Judge is exercising the powers of a Sessions Judge, he is undoubtedly a Criminal Court. Sec. 476, Criminal P. C. has given authority to every Civil, Revenue or Criminal Court to make a complaint if it is expedient in the interest of justice, concerning any offence referred to in Sec.195, Sub-sect
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.