SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1953 Supreme(Pat) 107

V.RAMASWAMI, SINHA
Bibi Nazma Khatoon – Appellant
Versus
R. P. Sinha, Custodian, Evacuee Properties – Respondent


Judgment

1. In these two applications, which were heard together, a common question of law arises, namely, whether the Custodian, Mr. R. P. Singh, acted in excess of his jurisdiction in setting aside the order of his predecessor, Mr. S. N. Ray, dated 29-9-1950.

2. On 12-8-1949, the petitioners purchased a house, namely, holding No. 98, of Ward No. 3 of Gaya town, from Mt. Bibi Akbari Khatoon and her sister Mt. Asghari Khatoon. The Sale deed was executed on behalf of Bibi Asghari Khatoon by Maulivi Abdul Rashid, her father-in-law, who had a general power of attorney on her behalf. The power of attorney was executed by Bibi Asghari Khatoon on 7-7-1949.

It is material to state that on 21-6-1949, the Bihar Administration of Evacuee Property Ordinance, 1949, came into force. Sec.25 of the Ordinance imposed certain restrictions on the right of transfer of evacuee properties made on behalf of evacuees after 31-3-1947, and Sec.26 of the Ordinance granted power to the Provincial Government to prohibit transfer of immovable properties or any part thereof in certain specified areas. On 24-8-1949, a notification was published by the Provincial Government, under Sec.26 of the Ordinance, prohibit

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top