SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1953 Supreme(Pat) 47

REUBEN, CHOUDHARY
Ramsaran Sao – Appellant
Versus
Bhagwat Shukul – Respondent


Judgment

Reuben, J.

1. This appeal arises out of a suit for the partition of a house situate in Mahalla Kharadi in the town of Bihar Sharif. The appellant was defendant No. 2 in the suit.

2. This house formerly belonged to a Joint Hindu family governed by the Mitakshra law, consisting of one Jhaman Ram and his son Rameshwar Ram, husband of Musammat Kapurni, who is defendant No. 1 in the present suit.

3. Rameshwar Ram died on 11-3-1938, and Kapurni succeeded to his interest in the property under the Hindu Womens Rights to Property Act, 1937, peelings between Musammat Kapurni and her father-in-law do not appear to have been pleasant, and on 12-7-1939, Jhaman Ram executed a deed of gift transferring the entire property to Bhagat Shukul, plaintiff in the present suit, who at the same time executed a mukarrari deed in favour of Jhaman Ram entitling him to remain in possession of the house so long as he lived. Musammat Kapurni thereupon filed a pauper suit, Title Suit No. 24 of 1940, in the court of the second Subordinate Judge, Patna, attacking the deed of gift as collusive and unreal. The suit was decreed and the decision was upheld both by the District Judge and by the High Court in --











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top