SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1953 Supreme(Pat) 92

NARAYAN, AHMAD
Mathura Singh – Appellant
Versus
Sm. Sudama Debi – Respondent


Judgment

Ahmad, J.

1. This application in revision is by defendant 1 against an order dated 2-5-1951, passed in Title Suit No. 58 of 1948 which is still pending for disposal in the second Court of the Subordinate Judge at Monghyr.

2. The suit is for declaration of title and recovery of possession in respect of land given in the Schedules attached to the plaint.

3. The suit was originally filed in forma pauperis and it was numbered as Miscellaneous Case No. 14 of 1948. This application for permission to sue in forma pauperis was, on hearing, rejected on 16-12-1948, and the Court passed the following order:

"From all these it can be safely inferred that the applicant has got sufficient means to pay the court-fee in the suit which is valued at Rs. 11000.00 only. In this view of my finding the Misc. case is rejected on contest with costs. Pleaders fee at Rs. 167- only."

It is evident from this order that the Court did nob give any time to the applicant for depositing the court-fee necessary in order that the application on its payment could have been converted into a plaint of a regularly constituted suit. Tha order sheet of the case shows that on 16-12-1948 three orders bearing Nos. 20

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top