SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1953 Supreme(Pat) 7

SARJOO PRASAD, V.RAMASWAMI
Commissioner Of Income Tax – Appellant
Versus
Kameshwar Singh – Respondent


Judgment

Ramaswami, J.

1. In this case the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal has formulated the following question of law lor the determination of the High Court :

"Whether in the circumstances of this case the sums of Rs. 7,917 for the assessment year 1945-46 and Rs. 9458 for the assessment year 1346-47 paid by the Assessee to the Viceroys war purposes Fund are taxable in the hands of the Assessee?"

According to the statement of the case the assessee who is Maharaja of Darbhanga purchased Government securities 1953-55 bearing interest at 8 per cent, on 17-11-1943. The interest on these securities amounted to a sum of Rs. 7,917 for the assessment year 1945-48 and Rs. 9,458 for the assessment year 1943-47. It is not disputed that these figures are correct or that the amount of interest was actually paid to the Viceroys war purposes Fund by the assessee.

It is claimed that the Maharaja of Darbhanga purchased securities as a result of correspondence between him and the Vicerene of India. The assessee had agreed that he would purchase 13 lacs worth of securities and that the interest therefrom would be paid to the Viceroys war purposes Fund for the duration of the War. Before the Income-tax



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top