SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1954 Supreme(Pat) 142

PATNA HIGH COURT
Ahmad and Imam JJ.
Kamla Singh
Versus
State Of Bihar
Criminal Appeal No. 417 of 1953 ;
Decided On : DECEMBER 23, 1954

The burden of proof lies on the accused to establish the defence of insanity, but the accused is entitled to the benefit of doubt if the evidence raises a reasonable doubt as to whether the accused was of unsound mind at the time of the offence.

Headnote:

CRIMINAL LAW - Murder - Insanity - Burden of Proof - Section 84, I. P. C. - Section 105, Evidence Act - Accused's unsoundness of mind rebuts presumption of sanity - Accused entitled to benefit of doubt - Conviction and sentence set aside.

Fact of the Case:

The appellant, Kamla Singh, was convicted under Section 302, I. P. C., for murdering his two brothers, Kailash Singh and Veyas Singh, and sentenced to transportation for life. The trial was held with the aid of three assessors, one of whom opined that the accused was guilty and the other two that he was not.

Finding of the Court:

The Court found that the accused was of unsound mind at the time he killed his brothers, but that he was capable of knowing the nature of his act. The Court held that the accused was not entitled to the benefit of doubt and convicted him of murder.

Issues: 1. Whether the accused was of unsound mind at the time of the offence. 2. Whether the accused was capable of knowing the nature of his act. 3. Whether the accused was entitled to the benefit of doubt.

Ratio Decidendi: 1. The Court held that the accused was of unsound mind at the time of the offence, based on the evidence of his previous and contemporaneous acts, statements, and demeanour, as well as the opinion of the Civil Surgeon. 2. The Court held that the accused was capable of knowing the nature of his act, based on his statement to the villagers that he had killed his brothers and his statement under Section 342, Criminal P. C., before the committing Magistrate. 3. The Court held that the accused was not entitled to the benefit of doubt, relying on the principle that the burden of proof lies on the accused to establish the defence of insanity.

Final Decision: The Court allowed the appeal, set aside the conviction and sentence, and directed that the accused be detained in safe custody and a copy of the judgment be sent to the State Government for taking action under Section 401, Criminal P. C.

Judgment

Ahmad, J.

1. The appellant Kamla Singh has been convicted under Sec.302, I. P. C., for having committed the murder of his two brothers Kailash Singh and Veyas Singh and has been sentenced to transportation for life. The trial was held with the aid of three assessors, one of whom opined that the accused was guilty and the other two that he was not.

2. The occurrence is said to have taken place on 2-10-1952, at about 10 p.m. In the family house of the appellant in village Kesrahi within, the jurisdiction of police station Daudnagar, which is at a distance of about four miles from it. All the family members including the appellant, his two deceased brothers and his mother were then living in that house. The house is closed all round with an entrance door on the north. Within the house there is a courtyard and on the east and south of the courtyard are the two closed verandahs. There are in all four rooms therein leaving the dwara where the entrance door is fitted. One of the rooms is situated on the southwest corner of it and is connected with the closed verandah on the south. That room, it appears, is generally used by the family as a cow-shed and pegs are fitted therein to tether animals. It is this room wherein the appellant is said to have assaulted his two brothers with a lota on their heads which caused instantaneous death to Kailash and fatal injury to Veyas Singh who ultimately died soon thereafter as a result thereof.

3. The facts leading to the murder have not been in this case challenged. What was pleaded at the trial and argued in this Court in defence was that at the time of the occurrence the accused was insane and he had lost his cognitive faculties and therefore his case falls within the provisions of Section 84; I. P. C., and as such he cannot be said in law to have committed any offence.

4. The admitted facts of the case are that the accused who at the time of the occurrence was aged about twenty-five years, while still a student in Class XI in the Daudnagar K. E, School, deve-loped symptoms of insanity and so he was then put into, Kanke Hospital on 14-12-1950. Before his admission into the Kanke Hospital, it is said, the appellant used to tear his clothes, walk naked and ease with clothes on indiscriminately at all places. In Kanke Hospital he improved soon and was discharged from there on 12-1-1951. For some time after the discharge, he remained quite normal but soon thereafter he again started behaving abnormally. About a year and a half before the present occurrence, he had assaulted one Kayast gentleman of his village. Due to the abnormalities in his conduct, the accused in his house during night time was usually kept locked ia the cow-shed by .the family members in order to avoid any -untoward incident which he might resort to then. His mental disquietness aggravated very much since some three months before the occurrence.

On the day of occurrence it. is admitted, that he became still more wild and his two brothers apprehending some danger from him put fetters round the feet of the appellant and that day he was mostly kept outside the house on the verandah. His fetters were, however, partially loose and so he could move about at least in his own house. And then his hands were also free. It is said that on being chained by his two brothers, his mental condition got all the more violent and he goaded by that idea began shouting in the house and abusing his brothers. At noon he refused to take food and kept behaving abnormally. In the night at about meal time the appellant Was brought to the zenana house with fetters on his feet and while he was there in the cow-shed he suddenly threw a brickbat at his mother Deo-barat Kuer (P. W. 2). This hit her on her head and she fell down on the ground and became unconscious. Seeing her falling Kailash Singh rushed to help his mother. As he entered the cow-Shed, the appellant lifted a lota from the angan and struck him straight on his head. At this his other brot


























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top