SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1954 Supreme(Pat) 131

IMAM, AHMAD
Rishi – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

Imam, J.

1. There are two petitioners, namely, Eishi alias Rishi Padda Dutta and Thakur Kishku. They were tried and convicted by Mr. J. N. Sinha, Magistrate, first class, at Jamtara under Section 7, Essential Supplies (Temporary Powers) Act, 1946, and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months each. They preferred an appeal against their conviction and sentence to the court of the Sessions Judge at Dumka. The learned Sessions Judge maintained the sentence, but altered the conviction under Section 7 of that Act to one under Section 8 of the same Act.

With the exception of this modification, the appeal was dismissed. Against the order of the learned Sessions Judge dismissing these petitioners appeal, the petitioners moved this Court in revision.

2. The prosecution case, in short, is that on 15-2-1952 at about 7 p.m. the learned Sub-divisional Magistrate of Jamtara, namely, Sri As Haseeb was returning in a jeep from Maithon dam and was crossing the Barakar river. It is alleged that he found two carts proceeding towards the said river and that each cart contained four bags of rice, each bag weighing about two maunds. The prosecution case further is that Khare Kis












































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top