SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1954 Supreme(Pat) 76

BANERJI, SINHA
Kedarnath Khetan – Appellant
Versus
Jainarain Ram Lundia – Respondent


Judgment

Sinha, J.

1. This appeal arises out of an objection to the execution of a decree against the plaintiffs, of whom the appellant is one, in a suit for specific performance of contract.

2. On 29-2-1936, a partnership firm known as Marwari Brothers, consisting of, amongst others, Jainarain Ram Lundia, Gobardhan Das, Badri Prasad and Bisheshwar Nath (after his death, Madan Lal), forming one group known as the Bettia Group and of the plaintiffs, namely, Kedarnath Khetan and Firm Surajmal Sagarrnal, known as the Padrauna Group, forming the other group, was brought into existence with the object of promoting a company for starting a sugar mill in Champaran and to secure a managing agency for that partnership firm. The capital of this firm was Rs. 8,00,000/-, consisting of 800 shares of Rs. 1000.00 each. Gobardhan Das and his brother, Badri Prasad had 100 shares; Jainarain had 150 shares and Madan Lal had 100 shares. Thus the total shares owned by this Bettia Group was 350. The plaintiffs owned the remaining 450 shares.

In pursuance of the agreement, a sugar mill was started and incorporated as a private limited company under the name of Ganga Devi Sugar Mills Limited with the capit


































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top