SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1954 Supreme(Pat) 62

CHOUDHARY, V.RAMASWAMI
Commissioner Of Income Tax – Appellant
Versus
Ranchi Electric Supply Co. Ltd. – Respondent


Judgment

Ramaswami, J.

1. In this case the assessee is a public limited company. The assessment year is 1947-48 and the accounting year is from 1-1-1946 to 31-12-1946. During this accounting year the assessee incurred an expenditure of Rs. 8,582 for installing new electric connections to consumers. The assessee received in its turn a total sum of Rs. 8,520 from the respective consumers for having taken the new electric connections. In the course of assessment proceeding the assessee claimed that the expenditure of Rs. 8,582 was expenditure on capital account and that depreciation should be allowed on this amount. The assessee also made a claim that the receipt of Bs. 8,520 from the consumers was of capital nature and ought not to have been taken into account for the assessment of tax. The income-tax officer rejected both the contentions raised by the assessee.

The Income-tax Officer held in the first place that the receipt from the consumers for service connection was of revenue nature and was liable to be taxed. The Income-tax Officer further held that the expenditure of Rs. 8,582 was also revenue in nature. The Income-tax Officer rejected the claim of depreciation on this amount b



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top