SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1954 Supreme(Pat) 6

CHOUDHARY, V.RAMASWAMI
Binoy Bhusan – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

1. In this case the petitioners have obtained a rule calling upon the opposite parties to show cause why a writ in the nature of mandamus should not be issued restraining them from imposing or collecting a holding tax levied by a resolution of the Mihijam Notified Area Committee. Cause has been shown by the learned Government Advocate on behalf of the opposite parties.

2. The petitioners are residents of three villages, Mihijam, Kanungui and Anui which have been formed into a Notified Area Committee known as the "Mihijam Notified Area Committee set up by a notification issued by the Government of Bihar. The draft notification was issued on 4-7-1950 inviting objections or suggestions from the persons likely to be affected. On 5-1-1951 the Government of Bihar acting in exercise of the powers under Sections 383 and 389 of the Bihar & Orissa Municipal Act applied to the Notified Area of Mihijam various provisions of the Act mentioned in the schedule to the notification. There was another notification dated 7-9-1951 wherein the Government sanctioned the imposition of holding tax by the Mihijam Notified Area Committee. This notification was issued under Section 82 of the Bihar an














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top