SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1955 Supreme(Pat) 70

SINHA, AHMAD
Kharag Narain – Appellant
Versus
Bibi Hamida Khatoon – Respondent


Judgment

Sinha, J.

1. This is an appeal by defendant 1 to the action. The suit was brought for declaration of title and recovery of possession together with mesne profits in respect of the suit lands. A short genealogy may now be given.

H 111.htm

The plaintiffs are daughters and son of Ilafiz. Their case is that the lands in suit belonged to Izharul Haque, who died leaving his widow, Asma Khatoon, and his son, Hafiz. After the death of Izharul Haque, the properties were inherited by Hafiz and his widowed mother, Asma Khatoon, Hafiz died leaving his widow, Mahmuda Khatoon, his mother, Asma Khatoon and two daughters and a son mentioned above.

According to the plaintiffs case, after the death of Ilafiz, the properties were inherited by all the heirs according to Mohamedan Law. The mother and the grandmother of the plaintiffs, according to their case, made an oral gift of their shares in the properties to the plaintiffs, and, thereupon, the plaintiffs became the 16 annas owners of the properties left by Hafiz. The plaintiffs were minors at the time of the death of Hafiz, which took place on 13-7-1932, and they were living under the guardianship of their mother, Mahmuda Khatoon.

On 3-4-1





































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top