SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1955 Supreme(Pat) 56

AHMAD, RAI
Janki Kuer – Appellant
Versus
Baldeo Choudhary – Respondent


Judgment

Rai, J.

1. This appeal by the plaintiffs is directed against the judgment and decree of the Special Subordinate Judge, Ranchi, confirming those passed by the Munsif of the same place.

2. Some relevant facts preceding the institution of the present suit may shortly be stated as follows. Plot No. 720 situated within the town of Ranchi belonged to Balmakund Marwari, the present defendant No. 3. In the year 1928, one Alam Khan got a money decree against Balmakund Marwari in a small cause court suit from the Court of the learned Small Cause Court Judge at Calcutta. The small cause court decree was transferred or execution to Ranchi where the execution case was numbered as Execution. Case No. 567 of 1928.

Subsequently, the decree-holder assigned his right, title and interest in the "decree to Bhagwat Dayal Sahu, grand father of Motilal Saha, the present defendant No. 2. The assignee of the decree was thereafter substituted in place of the original decree-holder in the execution proceeding. At the auction sale held on 8-8-1933, one-third share of plot No. 720 was sold and purchased by the assignee of the decree-holder.

On 11-11-1933, the auction purchaser got delivery of possessio


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top