SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1955 Supreme(Pat) 113

KANHAIYA SINGH, S.K.DAS
Bhim Chandra Mahto – Appellant
Versus
Deputy Director Of Education (Secondary) – Respondent


Judgment

Kanhaiya Singh, J.

1. This is an application under Article 226 of the Constitution for a writ in the nature of quo warranto calling upon opposite party Nos. 3 and 4 to exhibit the authority under which they are claiming to act as President and Secretary, respectively, of the Managing Committee of the Barabazar High School in the district of Manbhum and also for the issue of an appropriate writ restraining the opposite party from interfering with the affairs of the said school.

2. Sri Bhim Chandra Mahto who is a member of the Managing Committee of the Barabazar High School originally presented this application. Three more persons, namely, Dr. Jatindra Nath Modak and Gangadhar Singh, Secretary and Assistant Secretary, respectively of the Managing Committee, and Adya Charan Bhattacharjee, joint Head Master of the Barabazar High School, have, on their application, been added as petitioners sub-sequently. All the petitioners have a common case.

The opposite party consists of (1) the Deputy Director of Education (Secondary), Bihar, (2) Sri S. Thakur, Inspector of Schools, (3) Sri S. Prasad, Sub-Divisional Officer Purulia, President of ad hoc Managing Committee, and (4) Sri B. Sin










































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top