SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1955 Supreme(Pat) 127

AHMAD
Janendra Kumar Jain – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent


Judgment

Ahmad, J.

1. This is an application in revision under Sec.25 of the Provincial Small Cause Courts Act by the plaintiff against the judgment and decree passed in a small cause court suit dismissing his claim for damages for the non-delivery of 41 tins of Dalda consigned from Wadi Bandar to Arrah.

2. It appears that the consignor on 29th January, 1952, delivered to the railway authorities at Wadi Bandar on the G.I.P. Railway a consignment of Dalda packed in tins comprising 2785 of 10 Lbs each and 600 of 21 Lbs, each under R/R 656/47 for transit to Arrah on the E.I. Railway.

The consignment was carried in wagon No. 3935 and it reached Arrah on 9th February, 1952, at about 8.35 P.M. by 276 Down Goods train. At Arrah the consignment was found short of 41 tins of Dalda of 10 lbs each. Hence the suit for the recovery of Rs. 462-8-6 as the price of those 41 tins of Dalda and Rs. 23-8-6 on account of loss of profit at the rate of 5 per cent on the above amount and Rs. 12-8-0 on account of the cost of notices sent for the realisation of the aforesaid claim; thus for total sum of Rs. 498-9-0.

3. The Small cause court Judge found that the account of damages as given by the plaintiff in

























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top