SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1955 Supreme(Pat) 151

RAJ KISHORE PRASAD
Mahabir Ram – Appellant
Versus
Kapildeo Pathak – Respondent


Judgment

Raj Kishore Prasad, J.

1. Plaintiffs are the appellants. They have appealed against the order dated 12-4-1950 of Mr. Abanidhar Chatterjee, District Judge of Gaya, rejecting their memorandum of appeal for non-payment of court-fee within the period of limitation.

2. The last date for filing the appeal before tha learned District Judge was 28-3-1950. The appeal, however, was filed by the plaintiffs on 23-3-1950, on which date the appeal was registered, and the office was asked to report by 30-3-1950. On 30-3-1950 the office reported that the appeal was not properly stamped, inasmuch as a deficit court fee of Rs. 175/5/- should be paid on it. On that date the appellants put in petition for time to file the deficit court-fee. On this petition the court of appeal below passed an order that as the period of limitation had already expired the case should be put up on 11-4-50 for disposal. The deficit court-fee of Rs. 175/5/- was filed on 4-4-1950, before the date fixed in the appeal. On 11-4-1950 the appellants put in a petition before the court of appeal below praying to accept the court-fee paid by them.

On this petition the court of appeal below ordered the case to be put on 12-






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top