SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1956 Supreme(Pat) 121

V.RAMASWAMI, RAJ KISHORE PRASAD
Ram Chandra Prasad – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

Raj Kishore Prasad, J.

1. This rule has been issued by the High Court, on an application, under Article 226 of the Constitutoin, presented by the petitioners. They have asked for a writ in the nature of certiorari to call up and quash the proceedings started by opposite party No. 3, under Section 92 of the Factories Act, 1948 (Act LXIII of 1948), hereinafter referred to as "the Act".

They have further prayed for a writ of mandamus against opposite party No. 2, who is the Inspector of Factories, Patna Circle, directing him noli to demand any. licence, or licence fee," under the Act, from the petitioners, in respect of their establishment. Cause has been shown against the rule by the Government Advocate on behalf of the opposite party.

The Inspector of Factories, Patna Circle, opposite party No. 2, has also sent his replies on the points raised by the petitioners.

2. The petitioners case is that they own an establishment, of Ghanies (manufacture of oil), and Chakkis (flour milling), ill Mahalla Morchapur, police station Chauk, Patna City, in which only two employees work; and; as such it is not a factory within the meaning of the Act, and, therefore, the provisions of the Act














































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top