SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1956 Supreme(Pat) 61

RAJ KISHORE PRASAD, K.SAHAI
Ramautar Thakur – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

Raj Kishore Prasad, J.

1. This application under Sec. 561A, Criminal P. C., for restoration of Cri. Revu. No. 198 of 1956, which stood dismissed for default on 17-2-1956, by virtue of this Courts order dated 10-211956, arises in the following circumstances:

2. The petitioners filed a criminal revision application in this Court, challenging their convictions and the sentences passed upon them, on 10-2-1956, without a copy of the judgment of the trial Court.

On the 10th February, one weeks peremptory time was allowed for filing a certified copy of the trial Courts Judgment, failing which the revision application was to stand dismissed without any further reference to a Bench. The trial Courts judgment not having been filed within the peremptory time allowed by this Court, the criminal revision application filed by the petitioners stood dismissed for default on 17-2-1956, by virtue of the above. On 20-2-1956, that is, four days after the expiry of the peremptory date for filing the trial Courts Judgment the petitioners filed the present application for restoration of the criminal revision, and, for condoning the delay in filing the trial Courts judgment, which was filed along

































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top