SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1956 Supreme(Pat) 88

PATNA HIGH COURT
Imam, J.
Rakshya Singh
Versus
State Of Bihar
Criminal Reference No. 48 of 1956 ;
Decided On : MAY 11, 1956

The repeal of a law that creates an offense terminates any prosecution for that offense unless the repealing law provides otherwise.

Headnote:

ESSENTIAL COMMODITIES ACT - SECTION 16 - REPEAL OF LAWS - BIHAR COAL CONTROL ORDER - EXPIRY OF ESSENTIAL SUPPLIES (TEMPORARY POWERS) ACT, 1946 - EFFECT ON BIHAR COAL CONTROL ORDER - PROSECUTION UNDER SECTION 8 OF ESSENTIAL COMMODITIES ORDINANCE, 1955 - VALIDITY.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioners were summoned to stand trial under Section 8 of the Essential Commodities Ordinance, 1955, for allegedly storing and selling coal without a valid license. The Essential Supplies (Temporary Powers) Act, 1946, which controlled the supply and distribution of essential commodities, expired on January 26, 1955, and was replaced by the Essential Commodities Ordinance, 1955, which in turn was repealed by the Essential Commodities Act, 1955, on April 1, 1955.

Finding of the Court:

The court held that the prosecution of the petitioners under Section 8 of the Essential Commodities Ordinance, 1955, was invalid because the Ordinance had expired on the date of the alleged offense. The court also held that there was no Bihar Coal Control Order in existence under either the Ordinance or the Essential Commodities Act, 1955, and therefore the petitioners could not be prosecuted for violating such an order.

Issues: 1. Whether the prosecution of the petitioners under Section 8 of the Essential Commodities Ordinance, 1955, was valid, given that the Ordinance had expired on the date of the alleged offense? 2. Whether there was a Bihar Coal Control Order in existence under either the Ordinance or the Essential Commodities Act, 1955, which the petitioners could be prosecuted for violating?

Ratio Decidendi: 1. Section 16 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955, repealed the Essential Commodities Ordinance, 1955, and any other law in force in the State that controlled or authorized the control of essential commodities. 2. The Bihar Coal Control Order was made under the Essential Supplies (Temporary Powers) Act, 1946, which expired on January 26, 1955. The Order was not revived by the Essential Commodities Ordinance, 1955, or the Essential Commodities Act, 1955. 3. Therefore, there was no Bihar Coal Control Order in existence on the date of the alleged offense, and the petitioners could not be prosecuted for violating such an order.

Final Decision: The court accepted the reference and set aside the order of the Sub-divisional Magistrate summoning the petitioners to stand trial under Section 8 of the Essential Commodities Ordinance, 1955.

Judgment

Imam, J.

1. This reference has been made by the learned Additional Sessions Judge at Gaya. The Sub-Divisional Magistrate at Aurangabad by an order dated 14-9-1955, summoned the petitioners to stand their trial under Section 8 of the Essential Commodities Ordinance, 1955. It is alleged that the petitioners were found storing coal in village Jogia and were carrying on sale and storage without any valid authority or proper licence. On a written report submitted by the A. D. S. O. to the Sub-Divisional Magistate, Aurangabad, for prosecution under Section 8 of the Essential Commodities Ordinance, 1955, the petitioners were summoned to stand their trial. The learned Additional Sessions Judge recommended that the order of the Sub-Divisional Magistrate dated 14-9-1955, summoning the petitioners to stand their trial under Section 8 of the Essential Commodities Ordinance, 1955, be set aside as it was without jurisdiction.

2. It appears that the Essential Supplies (Temporary Powers) Act 1946 (Act 24 of 1946) Was an Act by which the essential commodities were controlled in their supply and distribution. Under that Act, it appears that, there was the Bihar Coal Control Order passed controlling the supply and storage of coal. The Essential Supplies (Temporary Powers) Act, 1946 (Act 24 of 1946) expired on 26-1-1955. As this Act was to expire On that date, an Ordinance known as the Essential Commodities Ordinance, 1955 came into existence on 21-1-1955. The object of this Ordinance was to control production, supply, sale, storage, distribution etc. of the essential commodities. It is said that thereafter a new Act came into force, namely, Act 10 of 1955, which is the Essential Commodities Act, 1955, on 1-4-1955.

It is said that this Act is precisely on the same line as Act 24 of 1946. It was submitted that on 25-6-1955 the alleged date on which the occurrence is said to have taken place, viz., 25-6-1955, the Essential Commodities Ordinance, 1955, was not in existence at all and thus there could be no prosecution under Section 8 of the said Ordinance. In my opinion, there is considerable force in this point. Mr. Shahi, however, appearing for the state, submitted that this was a technical objection inasmuch as similar provisions are to be found in Act 10 of 1955. In my opinion, even if this be a technical ground, the prosecution cannot be under the said Ordinance.

3. The next point taken by the learned lawyer was that there was no coal control order under the said Ordinance. It is true, it is submitted, that there was Bihar Coal Control Order under Act 24 of 1946 but the Act had expired and with it the Bihar Coal Control Order must be deemed to have expired too. In my opinion, there is some force in this submission. But even it be supposed that there is no merit in this point, the question, that has to be considered is whether the Act 10 of 1955 can govern a case like this. It was submitted in the Court below, and it is not shown to me otherwise, that there is no Bihar Coal Control Order either under the Ordinance or Act 10 of 1955. It is, therefore, necessary to see whether the said Bihar Coal Control Order can be said to be in existence in spite of the expiry of Act 24 of 1946. In my opinion, in view of the subsequent legislation, even if it be supposed that merely because Act 24 of 1946 had expired the Bihar coal Control Order did not expire on that ground, the provisions of Act 10 make it perfectly clear that the Bihar Coal Control Order under Act 24 of 1946 can have no application whatsoever. Sec.16 of Act 10 of 1955 is as follows :

"(1) The following laws are hereby repealed : (a) the Essential Commodities Ordinance, 1955 (I of 1955);

(b) any other law in force in any State immediately before the commencement of this Act in so far as such law controls or authorises the control of the production, supply and distribution of, and trade and commerce in, any essential commodity.

(2) Notwithstanding such repeal, any order made or deemed












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top