SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1956 Supreme(Pat) 156

K.DAYAL, CHOUDHARY
Jadunandan Gope – Appellant
Versus
Syed Najmuzzaman – Respondent


Judgment

Dayal, J.

1. These two applications in revision arise out of order No. 23, dated the 11th July, 1956, passed by the Munsif, 2nd Court, Patna.

2. Civil Revision No. 728 of 1956 arises out of Title Suit No. 101 of 1955. It relates to 12 bighas and odd lands. The prayer in the plaint is for a declaration that the lands are raiyati lands of the plaintiff and for permanent injunction. Civil Revision No. 732 of 1956 arises out of Title Suit No. 102 of 1955. It relates to 7 bighas and odd lands. The prayer in the plaint is for a declaration that the lands are the bakasht lands of the plaintiff and for permanent injunction. Title Suit No. 101 is valued at Rs. 200.00 and Title Suit No. 102 is valued at Rs. 100.00 on the prayer for injunction. The cause of action in both the suits is alleged to be interference with the possession of the plaintiffs by the main defendants who are common in both the suits. The plaintiff of Title Suit No. 101 is the husband of the plaintiff of Title Suit No. 102.

3. In both the suits, the court-fee has been paid under Section 7 (iv) (c) of the Court-fees Act, One objection raised in the written statements of both the suits is that the suit is beyond the













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top