SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1956 Supreme(Pat) 140

RAJ KISHORE PRASAD, V.RAMASWAMI
Ragho Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

Raj Kishore Prasad, J.

1. In this application, under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners have asked for a writ to quash the order dated 30-4-1954, passed by the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Arrah, under Section 8(5) of The Bihar Privileged Persons Homestead Tenancy Act, 1947, being Bihar Act IV of 1948, as amended by the Bihar Act 42 of 1951, hereinafter referred to as "the Act". Opposite party have shown cause and, opposite party 4 has also filed a counter-affidavit

2. On 15-10-1953, the Sub-Divisional Officer received a petition from Deonarin Chamar. opposite party 4, to the effect that he was a Harilan & he and his family were being harassed in several ways, they were being threatened, and there was a likelihood of their being evicted from their house, by the petitioners. On receipt of this application, the Sub-Divisional Officer Issued a notice to the petitioners to show cause why they should not be proceeded against under the Act, and, also under the Bihar Harijan (Removal of Civil Disabilities) Act, 1949, which is Bihar Act XIX of 1949, and also asked the officer-in-charge, Tarari police station to make an immediate enquiry into the matter



























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top